Are you looking for a worthwhile portable printer?
From our hands-on experience, we can say that it’s not an easy job to select a suitable pocket printer between LG Pocket Photo Printer Vs Polaroid Zip. Regular printer users often feel perplexed while comparing these options.
So, how can you improve your printing experience through a high-quality pocket printer?
Don’t worry. We are here with a comparative analysis of these two portable pocket printers. This article will let you know the specifications, pros and cons in simple words. Let’s start.
LG Pocket Photo Printer Review
LG pocket photo is an instant mini printer that seems like a soap tray in terms of size. You can face some problems while carrying this printer in your pocket, but its portability is beyond question.
It enables you to print by just pressing the “Send” button while you are in the way. This printer relieves you from the hassles of cables.
The most unique feature of an LG Pocket photo printer is its compatibility with inkless printing. It uses Zink papers which are free from ink. This amazing printing option ensures quality print. You can experience almost 313 DPI print resolutions here.
Usually, this printer offers 23 size photo printings within around 45 seconds. Its weight and dimension are around 212 gm and 120.9 x 24 x 72.4 mm, respectively. There are 3 colour variants available: Orange, Pink, and Silver. Its chassis is plastic-made.
LG pocket photo printers seem interesting to users due to their wireless and inkless printing. Moreover, it operates through rechargeable batteries that last for a longer period compared to its counterparts.
But it’s high purchase and printing costs make it less affordable to hobbyists and professionals. If you prefer speedy prints, LCD display, USB hostings along with SD card slots, the LG Pocket Photo printer will be a great choice for you.
Pros
- Easy operation
- Compact design
- Lightweight
- Zero ink printing
- Compatible with wireless printing
- Enabled with Bluetooth and NFC
Cons
- Expensive
- Limited connectivity
- Deliver small size prints
- Lacks pocketability
- Restricted facility for image correction
Visit Amazon to notice versatile models and features.
Polaroid Zip Pocket Printer
A polaroid Zip printer is a dedicated pocket printer nowadays. It works through Zink technology. Its average dimension is around 2.9 x 4.7 x 0.9 inches. Usually, Polaroid zip uses embedded dye crystals as photo paper. This printer applies heat to these crystals and creates images on them.
The initial setup of a polaroid zip printer is quite easy and straightforward. Its printing mechanism allows the users to change the photo papers without causing any significant hassles.
You can check “How To Use Photo Paper In Printer” to get a better understanding.
This printer offers all-around protection during its operations. It consists of shockproof layers. Besides, its roughed and anti-static foam keeps this machine safe from damage caused by sudden dropping or external pressure.
Moreover, the Polaroid Zip printer consists of a mesh pocket that holds cables and photo papers.
Pros
- Simplified setup
- Extreme portability
- Fast printing
- Vibrant colours
- Supportive of NFC and Bluetooth
- Travel-ready design
- Economical
- Convenient wireless printing
- Excellent compatibility with Apple and Android devices
Cons
- Colour printing is a little bit dark
- Substandard hue-saturation
- Weak battery service
- Medium print quality
For more details, check Amazon.
Factors Need To Consider While Choosing a Pocket Photo Printers
Print Speed
Both of these printers offer almost the same print speed. You can print around 40 pages per charge through an LG pocket photo while Polaroid Zip allows you to print around 30 documents per charge.
Cost
Cost performance is a vital issue in the debate of LG Pocket Photo Printer Vs Polaroid Zip. Beginners can’t always afford LG pocket Photo printers due to their high prices. On the other hand, Polaroid Zip printers have a wide-scale application as they offer a worthwhile price-to-performance ratio.
Print Resolution
LG pocket photo ensures better print resolution in photo printing compared to Polaroid Zip. You can experience 313400 DPI print resolution in the case of LG Pocket Photo. This DPI is good for photo printing, isn’t it?
But Polaroid Zip printers also offer more than 300 DPI in image printing. So, you can consider it as a tie.
Battery Service
Polaroid Zip printer battery lasts for an extended period than LG Pocket Photo printer. Both of them use rechargeable Lithium batteries. But Polaroid features are effective for long-term battery services.
Colour Printing
In the case of colour printing, Polaroid Zip printers have a slight drawback. They can’t ensure high-class hue saturation in printing colour documents. But LG Pocket photo printers have extensive use in colour printing because of their outstanding colour control capacity.
Portability
These printing options are extremely portable. But as a pocket printer, the LG Pocket Photo printer is not as user-friendly as Polaroid Zip.
You can easily carry a Polaroid Zip printer in your pocket while being on the move, functions, hiking, travelling, etc. These facilities are not common in LG pocket photo printers.
Durability
Who doesn’t look for a durable photo pocket printer?
As regular users, we can say that Polaroid Zip printers provide better durability than LG Pocket. They have effective layers and foam in the outer portions. That’s why external forces can’t do significant damage to Polaroid printers.
Connectivity
You must pay close attention to the connectivity of these printers. Polaroid Zip is compatible with iOS and Android devices. This printer uses A high-quality polaroid app that enables it to connect via Bluetooth, NFC, etc.
But LG Pocket Photo printers are supportive of USB hosts and SD cards. So, you can connect them to multiple smart devices and PCs.
Do you still have confusion?
Let’s focus on the side-by-side comparison to have an overall view at a glance.
Side-by-Side Specification Comparison
| Topic | LG Pocket Photo Printer | Polaroid Zip |
| Dimension | 2.84.60.89 in | 2.9 x 4.7 x 0.9 in |
| Weight | 212 gm | 186 gm |
| Battery | Rechargeable Lithium | Rechargeable Lithium Polymer |
| Charging Period | 1.4-1.5 hours | 1.5 hours |
| Print Per Charge | 20-25 | 25 |
| Portability | Worthwhile | High |
| Packatability | Medium | High |
| Durability | Effective | Excellent |
| Print Resolution | 313400 DPI | >300 DPI |
| App Feature | Mediocre | Supported by Polaroid App |
| Design | Compact | Stable |
| Print Time | 40-45 secs | 45 secs |
| USB Host, | OK | Limited |
| Battery Life | Long | Comparatively shorter |
| Print Format | 23 inches | 23, 33inches |
| Connectivity | NFC, Bluetooth | USB, Bluetooth |
| Price | >$400 | Around $100 |
| Print Speed | High (40 per paper) | Moderate (20-30 per paper) |
So, what’s your choice now?
Final Words
You need to be clear about your print requirements when you are going to pick a reliable printer between LG Pocket Photo Printer Vs Polaroid Zip. Here, the price-to-performance ratio makes a huge difference.
You can rely on Polaroid Zip printers for their cost-effective features and easy use. But if you don’t have a budget issue, you can think about LG Pocket Photo Printer to achieve a higher speed and better quality.
We hope this comparison article will help you to think wisely and make a pepper choice. If you want to get more details, contact us.
Happy printing.
FAQs
- Does Polaroid Zip Work With iPhone?
Polaroid Zip printers are supportive of iOS and Android. They provide connectivity through Bluetooth, NFC, USB, etc.
- How Long Does Polaroid Zink Paper Last?
Usually, Polaroid Zink paper lasts for almost 8-12 years. Its longevity depends on the use to a large extent. You can use Zink papers for around 8 years while using the outdoors.
- What Is Zink Zero Ink Printing?
The Zink technology refers to zero ink which means inkless printing. Zin papers are involved in this process. These print papers hold ink layers in the paper. So, Zink printing enables you not to be worried about ink cartridges or running out of ink during operations.
